For B2B SaaS founders, SEO leads, and agencies
Your SaaS may be missing from AI buyer shortlists.
I run real buyer questions through ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, then write up where your product appears, where it disappears, and which page is worth fixing first.
A useful finding by email in 24-48 hours when the test returns a clear signal.
- Manual testingNo generic crawler score
- 3 AI enginesChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity
- 24-48 hoursOne finding sent by email
- No sales callReview the evidence first
Sample audit workspace
A sample audit you can click through.
This sample uses public AI meeting-assistant prompts. It shows the structure of an audit, not live client tracking.
Visibility by promptYour brand vs surfaced competitors
Your brandTop competitor
Competitor benchmarkBrands surfaced most often
BrandVisibilityPosition
Granola71%#1.8
Jamie57%#2.4
Your brand43%#3.1
Supernormal29%#3.7
Source mixWhat AI answers lean on
ChatGPT surfaced Supernormal, but Granola and Jamie held the stronger cross-engine association. A focused bot-free workflow page is the first fix to test.
Read the underlying noteKnown-brand public checks
Use familiar brands as visibility anchors.
These are example brands used in public prompt checks and category benchmarks. They are not customers, partners, or endorsements.
Salesforce
HubSpot
Notion
Monday.com
ClickUp
Intercom
Zendesk
Otter.ai
Fireflies.ai
Fathom
Perplexity
Zapier
“Which CRM should a 30-person sales team consider if they care about AI follow-up workflows?”
Often surfacedSalesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive
What gets citedIntegrations, sales workflows, ecosystem proof
Audit questionDoes your SaaS show up for the use case, not just the category?
AI meeting assistants
Otter.ai, Fireflies.ai, Fathom, tl;dv, Granola
Project management
Notion, Monday.com, ClickUp, Asana, Linear
Customer support
Intercom, Zendesk, Help Scout, Freshdesk
The problem
Buyers are asking AI before they ever reach your site.
Your buyer may not search Google first. They ask:
- "Best AI notetaker for consultants"
- "Otter.ai alternatives with HubSpot integration"
- "Which tool is better for bot-free meeting notes?"
- "Best meeting intelligence tool for a 30-person sales team"
If your product is missing from those answers, you may lose the deal before a visit, demo request, or comparison page view.
Submit your SaaS
Send me your site. I will test one buyer question.
Send your website and work email. Category, competitors, and a buyer prompt are helpful but optional. I will send back one concrete AI-search visibility finding when the test returns a useful signal.
Two required fields. No attachment. No sales call. Best fit: B2B SaaS with a live website.
How I test
Here is the whole test. No mystery score.
I keep the question, the answer, and the recommendation together, so you can see exactly how I reached the conclusion.
- 01
Frame the buyer question
I review your site, category, and the job a buyer is trying to solve.
- 02
Run the same intent across engines
I test ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity and record the brands each answer surfaces.
- 03
Compare the recommendation logic
I look for repeated positioning, sources, integrations, use cases, and missing associations.
- 04
Map the gap to a fix
You get the first page, comparison, FAQ, proof signal, or positioning change worth testing.
AI answers are snapshots, not permanent rankings. Findings are dated and should be re-tested after meaningful content or source changes.
Who runs the audit
This is a hands-on beta, run by one person.
Leo Pu Founder, AI Search Audit
I built this service to answer a narrow question for B2B SaaS teams: when a buyer asks an AI tool what to choose, does your product make the shortlist? I run the prompts, review the public evidence, and turn the result into a practical fix list.
What we test
A small, buyer-intent prompt suite. Not a generic SEO crawl.
AI answer engines
ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in the beta audit.
Buyer prompts
Category, alternatives, integrations, use cases, and jobs-to-be-done prompts.
Competitors
We compare who appears, where they are cited, and which claims AI repeats.
Fix list
Prioritized pages, FAQs, comparison content, and third-party proof signals.
Sample finding
Example: an AI meeting assistant appears in category pages, but not in CRM workflow prompts.
This is the kind of concrete gap the audit is built to surface. The goal is not to produce a vague AI SEO score; it is to show the exact prompts where buyers see your competitors instead of you.
Open the full sample PDF
Prompt tested
"Which AI meeting assistant works best with HubSpot follow-up workflows?"
Visibility gap
Your brand appears in generic meeting-note prompts, but not in CRM-specific prompts where sales teams have higher buying intent.
Competitor pattern
Competitors with integration pages and clear sales-call use cases are easier for AI tools to recommend.
Recommended fix
Create a HubSpot integration page, add sales follow-up examples, and make the workflow quotable in comparison content.
Report preview
The sample audit is based on real AI meeting-note buyer prompts.
It covers ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity across alternatives, integrations, action items, bot-free notes, consultant workflows, and sales use cases.
Public examples
Recent AI-search visibility notes from the AI meeting assistant category.
Mini audits
Sembly, Supernormal, and Jamie visibility gaps
Short public notes you can reuse as LinkedIn posts or send after a profile visit.
SEO noteWhy AI tools recommend Granola over Supernormal for bot-free meeting notes
A long-tail page around bot-free AI notetaker positioning.
Benchmark assetAI Visibility Benchmark: AI meeting assistants
A leaderboard-style asset with category, prompt clusters, surfaced brands, missing brands, and sample findings.
SEO library10 long-tail AI-search visibility pages
Specific pages for ChatGPT recommendations, Perplexity, Granola vs Supernormal, Sembly vs Fireflies, and more.
What you get
A fixed deliverable your team can actually use.
AI visibility scorecard
A current baseline across answer engines, prompt clusters, and competitor mentions.
Prompt log
The tested prompts, what each AI tool returned, and where your brand appeared or disappeared.
Competitor benchmark
Which competitors show up most often, what positioning AI repeats, and where their sources are stronger.
Source and content gaps
Missing comparison pages, unclear integrations, weak third-party proof, schema gaps, or claims that are hard to cite.
30-day action list
A prioritized list of pages and proof signals to improve before re-testing.
Pricing
Start with one focused audit before building a recurring AI visibility program.
Free Sample
$0
One buyer prompt for your brand and one concrete visibility gap, when the test returns a useful signal.
Test one prompt freeFirst 3 audits
Full Audit
$79 beta
100 prompts, 3 AI engines, 3 competitors, prompt-level findings, and a 30-day fix plan delivered in 48 hours.
Start the $79 beta auditAgency Pack
Custom
White-label prompt suites and report templates for SaaS SEO or content agencies.
Ask about agency auditsBest fit
Useful when you already have a category, competitors, and buyers asking comparison questions.
Good fit
- B2B SaaS with at least 2-3 known competitors
- Founders or marketers who own organic growth
- SEO agencies adding AI visibility to client reports
- Teams with comparison, integration, or use-case pages to improve
Not a fit
- No live website or product page yet
- No clear category or competitor set
- Looking for guaranteed AI recommendations
- Expecting a long-term tracking dashboard from this beta audit
What this is not
A focused diagnosis, not another vague AI SEO promise.
This is not traditional keyword research, backlink analysis, rank tracking software, or an automated dashboard.
It also does not guarantee that AI tools will recommend your product. AI answers change by prompt, timing, location, and source availability.
What you get is a current baseline, competitor evidence, and a practical list of things to fix first.
Why manual first
Dashboards count mentions. I look for the reason behind them.
A dashboard can count mentions. This audit connects a missing mention to the likely reason: unclear category language, a weak comparison page, an integration story AI cannot quote, or stronger third-party evidence for a competitor.
The beta is intentionally hands-on. You receive a small body of evidence and an ordered fix list, not another monitoring account to configure.
FAQ
Short answers before you email.
Which AI engines do you test?
The beta audit covers ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. Custom agency work can add Claude, Google AI Overviews, Copilot, or Grok.
Do you need access to our analytics?
No. The beta audit uses your public website, public sources, competitor pages, and AI answer outputs. You can add analytics later if you want a deeper program.
What do you need from us?
Your website is enough to start. Category, competitors, and buyer prompts are optional context that can make the first test more specific.
Why is the beta price so low?
The first 3 audits are priced at $79 while the workflow is being tightened. The goal is to create strong sample work and learn which SaaS categories need this most.
Start small